Part C: Peer Feedback on Technology Driven Healthcare Solutions: QuickScan

The question I asked during the presentation, “QuickScan – The Handheld Diagnostic Tool,” was: “What are the current statistics on pediatric skin injuries presenting to our emergency departments, and how might this data support or challenge the feasibility and demand for QuickScan?”

This question promotes critical thinking by encouraging participants to connect data on pediatric skin injuries with the proposed use of QuickScan as a practical, preventive tool. It invites not only an evaluation of current trends in emergency department visits for pediatric skin injuries but also reflection on why these patterns matter and whether a technological solution like QuickScan is feasible and appropriate. By drawing attention to the high volume of such injuries presenting to emergency departments, the question highlights the potential to reduce preventable visits through accessible, at-home solutions. It also creates space for discussion around whether parents would trust and effectively use this type of device, and how it might empower them to make informed decisions about their child’s care. Furthermore, it raises important considerations about how healthcare technologies can support, rather than override, parental judgment. The question fosters a multidimensional conversation about pediatric care, digital health innovation, and the role of data in shaping more responsive, family-centered solutions.

I felt the question was answered thoughtfully and effectively. The presenter took the initiative to explore the statistical landscape surrounding pediatric emergency visits, which helped strengthen the background and support the gap identified in her presentation. Although no comprehensive or current national data was available, she did not fabricate information or attempt to overstate the evidence. Instead, she delivered a transparent and honest response, which added credibility to her argument. Her tone remained professional, and she demonstrated a calm, collected demeanor throughout the discussion. She was not thrown off by the question; rather, she responded with confidence and clarity, showcasing strong critical thinking and the ability to navigate uncertainty. Overall, her response was well grounded, sincere, and persuasive.

The QuickScan presentation demonstrated several strengths that contributed to its overall effectiveness. The problem was clearly defined, highlighting the growing issue of emergency department overcrowding, particularly due to minor injuries that often do not require urgent care. This framing immediately established the relevance of the proposed solution. The concept of QuickScan, a compact AI enabled handheld device for assessing minor to moderate skin injuries, was both innovative and timely. It addressed critical gaps in pediatric and adult care, particularly for individuals in rural or underserved communities. The presenter maintained a professional tone throughout, and a calm, composed demeanor, especially when responding to questions. In addition, the use of academic sources and credible references strengthened the presentation. Lastly, the “Vision for the Future” section demonstrated foresight, offering potential future applications of QuickScan in scenarios such as poison ingestion and concussion detection.

Despite these strengths, a few challenges were observed. Several slides, especially those in the pediatric and adult population sections, appeared visually repetitive and lacked variation in layout and content, which may have reduced audience engagement. Given that the topic centers around a technology-based solution, the presentation would have benefitted from more dynamic visual aids, such as user scenarios or mock-ups, to bring the QuickScan concept to life. Another limitation was the absence of comprehensive, up to date Canadian statistics on pediatric skin injuries. While the presenter appropriately acknowledged this gap, supplementing it with international or comparable data could have added further depth to the argument.

There are limited opportunities for growth, but a few refinements could further enhance the presentation. Improving slide design by reducing redundancy and incorporating more engaging visuals would help strengthen both clarity and audience engagement. Additionally, including stakeholder perspectives such as insights from parents, nurses, or clinicians in rural settings could add depth and ground the presentation in real world applicability. Overall, this presentation was engaging, well executed, and demonstrated a strong understanding of the content and its relevance to current healthcare challenges